[Sputnik-list] New commit of Sputnik with Subversion

[Yuri Takhteyev]

I haven't used C for close to ten years, so unfortunately, I can't be
of much help.  I think the best thing to do is to look at what Hisham
does with the rest of Kepler.

So, I don't know what's the best for LuaSVN in general, but for
Sputnik (and probably Kepler), I don't think it's important that the
libraries could be moved after being compiled.  I.e., if I can run a
build script passing it my "kepler" prefix (e.g.,
/home/yuri/tmp/sputnik/) and it compiles apr, subversion, luasvn into
where it needs to be (somewhere under /home/yuri/tmp/kepler/ but I
don't really care where exactly), I am not going to need to move it.

> Another problem, I did not test this using other systems, like BSD.

Well, right now we are on Ubuntu-only, so all of Linux would be a step
up already.  We can worry about BSD next - once there is someone who
is willing to try it on BSD.

> About, "get_object_history", if you do not return the timestamp, how are you planning to get it? Using a function that returns a given property of the revision?

This, or a table of properties, or just the object which would have
the properties in it.

  - yuri

-- 
Yuri Takhteyev
UC Berkeley School of Information
http://www.freewisdom.org/